Study of Medicare Patients Finds Most Hospital Errors Unreported

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

WASHINGTON — Hospital employees recognize and report only one out of seven errors, accidents and other events that harm Medicare patients while they are hospitalized, federal investigators say in a new report.

Yet even after hospitals investigate preventable injuries and infections that have been reported, they rarely change their practices to prevent repetition of the “adverse events,” according to the study, from Daniel R. Levinson, inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services.

In the report, being issued on Friday, Mr. Levinson notes that as a condition of being paid under Medicare, hospitals are to “track medical errors and adverse patient events, analyze their causes” and improve care.

Nearly all hospitals have some type of system for employees to inform hospital managers of adverse events, defined as significant harm experienced by patients as a result of medical care.

“Despite the existence of incident reporting systems,” Mr. Levinson said, “hospital staff did not report most events that harmed Medicare beneficiaries.” Indeed, he said, some of the most serious problems, including some that caused patients to die, were not reported.

Adverse events include medication errors, severe bedsores, infections that patients acquire in hospitals, delirium resulting from overuse of painkillers and excessive bleeding linked to improper use of blood thinners.

Federal investigators identified many unreported events by having independent doctors review patients’ records.

The inspector general estimated that more than 130,000 Medicare beneficiaries experienced one or more adverse events in hospitals in a single month.

Many hospital administrators acknowledged that their employees were underreporting injuries and infections that occurred in the hospital, he said.

When the National Academy of Sciences issued a landmark report on patient safety in 1999, many experts said that hospital employees were often afraid to admit mistakes. But that no longer appears to be the main obstacle to reporting, federal investigators said.

More often, Mr. Levinson said, the problem is that hospital employees do not recognize “what constitutes patient harm” or do not realize that particular events harmed patients and should be reported.

In some cases, he said, employees assumed someone else would report the episode, or they thought it was so common that it did not need to be reported, or “suspected that the events were isolated incidents unlikely to recur.”

To clear up confusion, Medicare officials said they would develop a list of “reportable events” that hospitals and their employees could use. In addition, the Medicare agency said, hospitals should give employees “detailed, unambiguous instructions on the types of events that should be reported.”

The Obama administration and hospital industry leaders have placed a high priority on reducing medical errors. But, the report said, at many hospitals, this high-level commitment has not been translated into practice.

The inspector general found that “hospitals made few changes to policies or practices” after employees reported harm to patients. In many cases, hospital executives told federal investigators that the events did not reveal any “systemic quality problems.”

Organizations that inspect and accredit hospitals generally “do not scrutinize” how hospitals keep track of medical errors and other adverse events, the study said.

The federal investigators did an in-depth review of 293 cases in which patients had been harmed. Forty of those cases were reported to hospital managers, and 28 were investigated by the hospitals, but only five led to changes in policies or practices, the study said.

More than 2,900 hospitals have joined the administration in a “partnership for patients” intended to reduce errors and save 60,000 lives in three years.

At least 27 states have laws that require hospitals to report publicly on infections that patients develop in the hospital, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, up from 6 at the end of 2005.

In view of the state laws, Obama administration officials said they were not proposing new federal requirements for the public reporting of adverse events.

View the original article here

Books: Two choices to better read for a hospital stay

Two new books are on this last task. A homes on the most majestic wildlife resident, divine footsteps surgeons in the hospital corridors, breezing past the rest of us dithering pill-pushers shortly discussed on our computers. Many surgeons can be small women these days, but somehow, they all seem to 15 feet in height.

Dr. Paul a. Ruggieri summarizes their ethos bluntly: If you are patient, "I do not exist to talk about your heartburn, of neck pain, gain of weight, fatigue, or swollen legs." This is not my job and, frankly, I am not interested. "The surgeon, said, is to operate (or sometimes more difficult to determine operating). The rest of the book belongs to the small crowd, leaning, dithering.

In General, the surgeons that meet us as memories are somewhat atypical of the species, such as the poet-philosopher Richard Selzer, or the thoughtful political guy Atul Gawande. Dr. Ruggieri, by his own description, is a regular Joe Scalpel: a student means, he is a graduate in debt in the middle of his medical school class, survived a grueling old style residency program and now works in private practice in a community hospital.

As a general surgeon, Dr. Ruggieri spends his time not probe for the location of the soul, but deeply in intestinal cuttings: "I must take several feet of your colon, sir." "It sound good next week"?

Of course, just because you are a demigod in the O.R. does not mean you are exempt from the perplexities of modern medicine, and it turns out surgeons get their share and much more. For all the immediate gratification of the calling - they can resurrect the dead with a few knife slashes and a purse-string suture - they are too condemned to a bit of dithering.

Calculation of risks and benefits of surgery in a sick patient age is only a part of it. Like everyone, surgeons are tormented by ambiguous test reports, including careful wording often forces in an unnecessary operation. Right of malpractice casts a giant shadow in their decision-making process, with statistics showing that virtually all surgeons will be named in a suit at a point in a career.

Dr. Ruggieri meditates at length on poor surgical results - some the foul the poor surgeons, some of the bad equipment, some bad luck. Human flesh is never completely reliable and a successful operation will not necessarily improve the health of the patient. Inexperience, impatience and fatigue can all undermine fundamentally competent surgeon; Dr. Ruggieri makes the interesting point that even if training programs now restricting resident work hours, a fully qualified surgeon may nevertheless have been up all night with an emergency before a full day of elective surgery, including yours.

And while the sailing smooth in the operating room is an exhilarating rush and ego - boosts, things can go wrong in an instant, leaving the surgeon "grasping blindly in a rising pool of blood."

Some statistics describing "best" hospitals for a given type of surgery are available to the public, but measures of performance for individual physicians are generally not. Ask your surgeon before your procedure, Dr. Ruggieri complication rates suggests - you will need to assume the answer is true. And if you want to know what happened while you were sleeping, track down the report of the device (although even in this document may not reflect all nests hen trip).

It must be said with some emphasis that the realistic dialogue of creation is not strong of Dr. Ruggieri, but the reader will forgive him stiff-necked paragraphs, it encloses quotation marks for the immediacy and honesty of the rest of his story. He offers anecdotes required featuring unhappy people impaled by sharp objects (including the Horn of a rhinoceros irritated), but it is at its best describing his own worst moments, muttering under his breath to a recalcitrant section of the intestine, his right eye twitches anxiety, wondering why he did not go for MBA instead.

A preoperative patient may prefer to leave the book of the Dr. Ruggieri at home until it is safely on. Elizabeth Bailey book, however, specifically to include in the suitcase of the hospital, a marketing gimmick is not a bad idea at all.

Checklists for doctors to perform have shown to reduce errors in the hospital. Ms. Bailey offers a collection of checklists for a patient finish for the same purpose. There are lists for "going" and "" during your stay,"various ways to organize the cup of unfamiliar drugs left by your bedside and articles for your escape planning and deal with your insurance." We need someone who is ill exceptionally energetic to fill everything, the book will be a boon for concerned friends and relatives, trying to rein in the chaos.

And for background reading, no one should miss introductory essay of Ms. Bailey: a producer of music videos, she was pushed in the role of patient advocate when his old father has been systematically mauled by one of the major teaching hospitals in New York. Bravo to him to turn that all too common misery for a constructive purpose.

View the original article here

Treatment at the hospital for anorexia is challenged.

The strategy, called "low early, advance slowly," often results in loss of weight or extra fluid in the first day or two of hospitalization. Now some researchers and health providers, both the United States and abroad, contest departure-low approach, suggesting that many patients may be fed more aggressively as long as they are closely monitored for medical complications.

Scientific evidence in support of the bass-start method have been rare. In a study published online in the Journal of Adolescent Health, in August, researchers at the University of California, San Francisco, sought to evaluate more closely, examining the weight gain of adolescents hospitalized on a recharge Protocol recommended in what they think, this is the first study of this kind.

The study, which involved 35 young people, found that 83 percent on the scheme of departure-bas, which have been fed 1,200 calories per day with increases of 200 calories every other day, have lost weight. On the whole, patients did not regain weight lost newly to the sixth day in hospital, an average of.

"It is very shocking to parents," said Andrea k. Garber, Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the University of California, San Francisco and the principal author of the study. "The irony is that the goal of hospitalization is to get the child renourished and we spend the first eight days without any weight gain."

While it is not uncommon for a patient with anorexia lose weight after hospitalization, most practitioners fluid loss, mostly water attribute.

"There is a body of evidence that our older, more careful feeding strategies are older and wiser that they must be," said Dr. David s. Rosen, Professor of Pediatrics, internal medicine and Psychiatry, school of Medicine of the University of Michigan, which leads to the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Adolescence.

Still, he and other doctors urge caution before making radical changes in the treatment, stating that research needs more to be done. Twenty percent of patients in the study U.C.S.F. had low blood phosphorus levels, indicating a high risk of developing a potentially fatal condition called refeeding syndrome and electrolyte imbalance, noted Dr. Rosen.

"We have shown that the regular approach, we do not make as much progress that we would like," he said. "But we know that the power of the people more aggressively is a safe thing to do." The answer is, not really. ?

Although medical practices are far from uniform and treatment is customized according to the circumstances of the patient, a typical schema starts young patients with meals and snacks totalling approximately 1,200 calories per day.

New schemas evaluated - and already brought in some hospitalized patients programs - start patients with 1,900 calories a day. In a week and a half, a patient may be consumed 3 000 or more calories per day. The danger is that these patients may experience a refeeding syndrome, which can cause many complications including heart arrhythmia and death, when you try to return to the normal diets too quickly. These patients may also have developed digestive disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, diarrhea, and constipation. They can involuntarily vomit because the stomach and digestive capacity is decreased.

And there are psychological problems. Hunger affects capacity cognitive, experts say, and often of consultation cannot be effective until the weight is restored. Until then, patients with eating disorders are subject to continuing aversion to food.

"Think about the psychological trauma of being in a hospital and have to eat all the food," said Marjorie Nolan, a dietitian in Manhattan, specializing in eating disorders and a spokesman for the Academy of Nutrition and dietetics. "These young are young, they cannot process the information, and here they gained five pounds in a week and their greater fear is happening: they are in progress in bold.". Who knows is not true, but it is how they see. ?

Ms. Nolan said one of his patients, who is now 18, was fed aggressively at the age of 15 years and he put his back recovery in the long term.

"They had the weight back on it, which he medically stabilized to some extent, what was necessary, but it was so aggressive that now, a few years later, she is still traumatized by it,", said Ms. Nolan. "."

A woman of 27 years in the area of the city of New York who was hospitalized twice, at the age of 18 years and again at 20, said aggressive recharge can be psychologically overwhelming and even physically painful.

"Your stomach shrinks when you eat, so it feels like Thanksgiving, every day, when you are in the hospital getting large quantities of food," said the woman, who asked that his name retained to maintain his privacy. "It is physically difficult to walk around time after, and it is difficult to keep all." After consuming so little for so long, she said: "you eat a carrot and you feel it".

She said that she found much weight during his first hospitalization but was so upset by gain rapid that she lost quickly weight once she was released. Two years later, she was hospitalized again but remained in the hospital for a longer stay of six weeks.

The current guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend slow Rehydrating children suffering from malnutrition and adolescents to avoid refeeding syndrome; Society of medicine and adolescent health also recommends "the gradual increase in caloric intake.

But in an editorial accompanying the new study of U.C.S.F., Dr. Debra Katzman, Chief of the division of Medicine of the adolescents to the hospital for sick children, said that overzealous application of the guidelines conservative recharge had resulted in death in some cases.

The United States pressure to keep the short hospital stays made rapid weight gain still more urgent, because the goal is to restore as much weight as possible before the release, she said in an interview.

Experts agree that much more research is needed to develop clear guidelines, based on evidence for treatment.

"We do not know how best to treat these children, even when they wind up in the hospital", said Dr. Rosen. "It's a balancing act number." You want to do is find place sweet between feeding people as aggressively as possible but are not of refeeding syndrome, which is a lethal, frightening, dangerous disease. ?

View the original article here